CO129-622-8 Pre-war claim on Admiralty for supply of flour 21-10-1949 - 9-3-1950 — Page 4

the H.K. fort for the whole amout

-n

4

at least for the 4,400 lags.

Ir Danett me timed this matter briefly at a Tranny meeting

the other day & said their new

& said their new was that if say in a bonded wave house

in the U.K, certain goods were set aside for Navy

I

only a

portion of there were und & the Enlance destroyed by enemy action, He Navy would sly may for the quantity actually and. I do not know if this is comuet, & if so, whether it naturally follows that the same would apply in H.1. I would add that there was no un compensaten er inverance schone in H.K. & thenfore the fort cannot reimburse themceles from any

mich source.

Could you please adiere whether the Solector Generali qunin

диль

a cral (10) to (3) is a xaconable me & whether the

H.K. claim that as the flor

Lothy

requentioned at the request of

He Naval authorities note the Nary resprouble for paying for it although

they may consumed

400 hays at of 7,255?

Illall

3/3.

Mr Hall.

1. The

добочого of flom which

لا

Th

s for 335,500 requisitioned by the

I A5

#5 win

Hik. goot on behalf of the

Col. Def hys. 1940

Wason why

mail

Li

should not

the Aut should

limbile for

The fact that the

2

L

620

me

inscribed

16

Th

Zi

be

the full amount.

wring

in the melevant

loss from the

مال

amoment of bags

wamant

Sum

the Asti suffered

enumeration.

mistaken

All wal

4. },

DH

он жил

长